Mixon v. Mosley et al (INMATE1)
Case Number: 2:2006cv00342
Filed: April 14, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that: 1. The defendants' 9 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED. 2. Judgment be GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 3/26/2009. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 3/13/2009. (dmn)
April 18, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Bernard Montez Mixon that: 1. The plaintiff's claims against the State of Alabama be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the directives of 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii). 2. The 1983 claims presented against Steven B. Canty, officer Pryor, Sgt. Hullet and Warden Gwendolyn Mosley be referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 5/1/2006. Signed by Judge Susan Russ Walker on 4/18/2006. (dmn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mixon v. Mosley et al (INMATE1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?