Mock et al v. Chandeleur Homes, Inc. et al

Case Number: 2:2006cv00395
Filed: May 2, 2006
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
Referring Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 22, 2007 33 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT, pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that def Champion Enterprises, Inc. is dismissed without prejudice; Chadeleur Homes, Inc. still remains a defendant; directing the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/22/07. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
August 20, 2007 31 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT, pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal 30, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that this cause is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with costs taxed as paid; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/20/07. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mock et al v. Chandeleur Homes, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?