Mock et al v. Chandeleur Homes, Inc. et al
| 2:2006cv00395 |
| May 2, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
JUDGMENT, pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that def Champion Enterprises, Inc. is dismissed without prejudice; Chadeleur Homes, Inc. still remains a defendant; directing the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/22/07. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
|
|
Filing
31
JUDGMENT, pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal 30, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that this cause is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with costs taxed as paid; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/20/07. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mock et al v. Chandeleur Homes, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
