Martin v. Holt et al (INMATE2)
Case Number: 2:2006cv00490
Filed: May 31, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDERED that on or before 6/29/06, plaintiff shall amend his 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint to provide additional factual information as set out in order. Signed by Judge Susan Russ Walker on 6/19/06. (sl, )
June 15, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDERED that: (1) the 6 objection is overruled; (2) the 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) the 2 motion for preliminary injunction is denied; (4) this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/15/06. (sl, )
June 7, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: (1) plaintiff's 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction be denied; (2) this case be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 6/16/2006. Signed by Judge Susan Russ Walker on 6/7/06. (sl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Holt et al (INMATE2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?