Brooks v. Barrow et al (INMATE2)

Case Number: 2:2006cv00499
Filed: June 2, 2006
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
Referring Judge: Delores R. Boyd
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 19, 2006 8 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT it is the Order, Judgment, and Decree of the court as follows: 1) Plaintiff's objections doc 6 are overruled; 2)Adopting 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Calvin Bernard Brooks; 3) This lawsuit is di smissed without prejudice; It is further ordered that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/19/06. (Attachments: # 1 appeals checklist)(vma, )
June 5, 2006 4 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Calvin Bernard Brooks; It is the Recommendation of the Mag Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case; Objections to R&R due by 6/19/2006. Signed by Judge Delores R. Boyd on 6/5/06. (vma, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooks v. Barrow et al (INMATE2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?