Parker v. Givens et al (INMATE 1)
Case Number: 2:2006cv00649
Filed: July 21, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
Presiding Judge: W. Harold Albritton
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Levan Thomas, Relford Kendrick, Grauland A. Davis, Gwendolyn Givens, Roosevelt Lewis, Sharon Roger; it is the Recommendation of the Mag Judge that: 1) The defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted; 2) Judgment be granted in favor of the defendants; 3) This case be dismissed with prejudice; 4) The costs of this proceeding be taxed against the plaintiff; Objections to R&R due by 4/20/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 4/7/09. (vma, )
July 26, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full as further set out in order; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk SCF; furn: cashier. Signed by Judge Vanzetta P. McPherson on 7/26/06. (vma, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker v. Givens et al (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?