Morton v. Holt (INMATE 1)

Case Number: 2:2006cv00885
Filed: October 2, 2006
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 30, 2009 28 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re MOTIONS for Summary Judgment filed by Arnold Holt, Allen; The dfts' motion for summary judgment be granted; Judgment be entered in favor of the dfts; the costs of this proceeding be taxed against the plaintiff; this case be dismissed with prejudice; Objections to R&R due by 2/13/2009. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 1/30/09. (vma, )
October 5, 2006 4 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $34.16 be paid on or before 10/24/06; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Bullock County Correctional Facility, as directed. Signed by Judge Susan Russ Walker on 10/5/06. Furnished to cashier. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morton v. Holt (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?