Case Number: 2:2006cv01079
Filed: December 5, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Anthony Hendon; it is the Recommendation of the Mag Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure of the plaintiff's abandonment of his claims and his failure to comply with the orders of this court; Objections to R&R due by 10/16/2008. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 10/3/08. (vma, )
December 6, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full as further set out; granting. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at ECF. Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 12/6/06. (vma, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hendon v. Riley et al (INMATE1)(NO DISCOVERY WITHOUT LEAVE OF COURT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?