Martin v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 19, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Mag Judge that: 1) re 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Billy Pittman, W. Copeland, Richard Allen, M. Sanford, Leon Forniss, Edward Robinson be granted; 2) Judgment be granted in favor of the defendants; 3) This case be dismissed with prejudice; 4) The costs of this proceeding be taxed against the plaintiff; Objections to R&R due by 6/1/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 5/19/09. (vma, )
|May 1, 2007
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Mag Judge that: (1) the claims Martin presents against the State of Alabama Dept of Corrections be dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance wtih the provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (2 ) the State of Alabama Dept of Corrections be dismissed from this cause of action; (3) this case, with respect to the claims lodged against the remaining defendants, be referred back to the undersigned for appropriate proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 5/14/2007. Signed by Judge Wallace Capel Jr. on 5/1/07. (djy, )
|April 19, 2007
ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $10.00 be paid on or before 5/18/07 ; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Staton Correctional Facility. Signed by Judge Wallace Capel Jr. on 4/19/07. Furnished to cashier. (djy, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?