Hicks v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 21, 2008
ORDERED that the 20 Report and Recommendation is adopted and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1997(e)(c)(1). An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 10/21/2008. (cb, )
|October 3, 2008
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(1). Objections due 10/16/08. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 10/3/2008. (cb, )
|June 12, 2007
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that : (1) The plaintiff's claim against the ADOC, Richard Allen, Leon Formiss, and the Staton Correctional Facility be dismissed prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (2) T he ADOC, Richard Allen, Leon Forniss and the Staton Correctional Facility be dismissed as defendants in this cause of action; and (3) This case, with respect to the plaintiff's claim against Lt. Copeland, be referred back to the undersigned for appropriate proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 6/25/2007. Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/12/2007. (cb, )
|June 11, 2007
ORDER directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Staton Correctional Facility . Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/11/2007. (cb, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?