Bennett v. King et al (INMATE1)
| Jerry Dale Bennett |
| Eugene Reese, Troy King, Richard Allen, Kenneth Jones, Christopher Gordy, Marcus Atkinson, Ronald Carter and Prison Health Services |
| 2:2007cv00628 |
| July 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Mark E. Fuller |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Jerry Dale Bennett, it is the Recomm of the Mag Judge that: 1) The plaintiff's claims arising from actions taken against him and conditions of confinement during his incarceration at the Willaim E. Donaldson Corr Fac. be dismissed without prejudice to the rights of the plaintiff to file a separate 42 USC 1983 action int he USDC for the NDAL; 2) Kenneth Jones, Christopher Gordy, Marcus Atkinson, Ronald Carter and Prison Health Services be dismissed as parties to this cause of action; 3) The plaintiff's claims against Troy King, Richard Allen and Eugene Reese be dismissed with prejudice as further set out; 4) The plaintiff's claim challenging the conditions of confinement at the Kilby Corr Fac. be referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 7/30/2007. Signed by Judge Charles S. Coody on 7/17/07. (vma, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
