Mann v. Darden et al
||Police Officer Number 1, Police Officer Number 2, Police Officer Number 3 and Police Officer Number 4
||August 22, 2007
||Alabama Middle District Court
||Myron H. Thompson
||Susan Russ Walker
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 23, 2009
ORDER that plaintiff Sue-Zanne Mann's 89 Motion for New Trial is denied as to the "first-tasing incident" and granted as to the "second-tasing" incident. An order setting a retrial date on the "second-tasing" indicent will follow later. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 11/23/2009. (dmn)
|July 6, 2009
OPINION AND ORDER that Plaintiff Sue-Zanne Mann's 33 Motion to Strike is denied as further set out in the order. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 7/6/2009. (dmn)
|July 2, 2009
ORDERED that re parties' 42 motion in limine, 44 response, and 54 exhibit-list objections, counsel for all parties are to do the following: (1) meet, in person, by no later than 7/13/09 to attempt to resolve the issues raised in the motion in limine, response, and exhibit-list objections, as well as any other potential objections not raised in those filings; and (2) file a jointly prepared report by 7/16/09 (a) as to which issues are resolved and which ones remain unresolved and (b) for each and every unresolved issue, setting forth in detail the position of each side. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 7/2/09. (sl, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?