Carey v. Alabama Pardon & Paroles et al (INMATE1)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 24, 2011
JUDGMENT that plaintiff's 107 objections are overruled; that 104 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS is adopted; that defendants' 23 , 25 , 37 , 40 , & 56 motions for summary judgment are granted; that Judgment is entered in favor of defen dants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint; that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; that the clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; that this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 2/24/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )
|October 20, 2008
JUDGMENT as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 69 Objections are overruled; (2) the 65 Magistrate Judge's Order is AFFIRMED; and (3) This cause is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 10/20/2008. (cb, )
|February 6, 2008
ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 9 Objection is overruled; (2) The 7 Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ADOPTED;(3) Plaintiff's claims against defendants Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and Victims of Crime Against Lenien cy are dismissed; (4) Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and Victims of Crime Against Leniency are dismissed; and (5) This cause in all other respects are referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings. Signed by Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/6/2008. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?