Burkette v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al
David Michael Burkette |
Montgomery County Board of Education and Lewis E. Washington, Jr. |
2:2007cv01121 |
December 26, 2007 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Elmore |
William Keith Watkins |
Terry F. Moorer |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: (1) defendants' 35 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted in part and denied in part; (2) all claims against defendant Washington in his official and individual capacity be dismissed with prejudice; (3) plaintiff's claims brought pursuant to 42 USC 1983 be dismissed with prejudice; (4) plaintiff's Title VII claims related to the Athletic Director position be dismissed as time-barred; (5) the motion for summary judgment be denied as to the assertion that the claims related to the Assistant Football Coach position are jurisdictionally barred; (6) plaintiff's Title VII race discrimination claim related to the Assistant Football coach position be dismissed with prejudice because plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case; (7) the sole remaining claim pending before the Court is plaintiff's retaliation claim related to the Assistant Football Coach position. Objections to R&R due by 11/10/2008. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 10/28/08. (sl, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.