Jones v. Forniss et al (INMATE2)
Plaintiff: Boykin Jones
Defendant: Leon Forniss, Nitka Shambary and Ontourus Porter
Case Number: 2:2008cv00220
Filed: March 26, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office
County: Barbour
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER directing that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Defendant Nikkita Shambray's 41 objections are overruled. (2) The magistrate judge's 40 recommendation is adopted. (3) Defendant Leon Forniss's 15 motion for summary judgment is granted. (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Forniss and against plaintiff Jones, with plaintiff Jones taking nothing as to his complaint against defendant Forniss. This case is termin ated as to defendant Forniss. (5) Defendant Shambray's 22 motion for summary judgment is granted to the extent that she is sued in her official capacity. (6) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Shambray and against plaintiff Jones to th e extent defendant Shambray is sued in her official capacity, with plaintiff Jones taking nothing as to his complaint against defendant Shambray in her official capacity. (7) Defendant Shambray's 22 motion for summary judgment is denied to the extent defendant Shambray is sued in her individual capacity for excessive force. (8) This cause is referred back to the magistrate judge so that she can hold an evidentiary hearing on plaintiff Jones's excessive-force claim against defendant Shambray in her individual capacity. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 1/31/11. (scn, )
January 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER denying 41 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 1/25/11. (scn, )
January 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER denying 44 Motion to Appoint Counsel, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 1/11/11. (scn, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Forniss et al (INMATE2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boykin Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leon Forniss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nitka Shambary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ontourus Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?