Hayes v. Giles et al (INMATE2)
| Eddie Ahmad Hayes |
| Warden Giles, Dr. Farrell, Mrs. James and Mr. Jenkins |
| 2:2008cv00416 |
| June 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Barbour |
| Wallace Capel |
| Mark E. Fuller |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER that plaintiff's 47 objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on December 3, 2010 is overruled; that 42 Report and Recommendations is ADOPTED; that Defendants Giles and Jenkins' 22 motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim is GRANTED; that Defendants' 13 , 14 , 22 and 32 motions for summary judgment on plaintiff's ADA claim are GRANTED; that Plaintiff's claims against defendants Giles and Jenkins are DISM ISSED with prejudice; that Defendants Ferrell and James' 13 , 14 and 32 motions for summary judgment on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim are GRANTED to the extent these defendants seek dismissal of this claim due to plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him at the Ventress Correctional Facility; that Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Ferrell and James are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy available to him during his confinement at the Ventress Correctional Facility; that costs of this action are taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 1/4/2011. (cc, )
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER that 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS is ADOPTED; that Defendants Giles and Jenkins' 22 motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim is GRANTED; that Defendants' 13 , 14 , 22 and 32 motions for summary judgment on plaintiff's ADA claim are GRANTED; that Plaintiff's claims against defendants Giles and Jenkins are DISMISSED with prejudice; that Defendants Ferrell and James' 13 , 14 and 32 motions for summary judgment on plaintiff 's Eighth Amendment claim are GRANTED to the extent these defendants seek dismissal of this claim due to plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him at the Ventress Correctional Facility; tha t Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Ferrell and James are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy available to him during his confinement at the Ventress Correctional Facility; that costs of this action are taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 12/2/2010. (cc, )
|
|
Filing
42
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Defendants Giles and Jenkins' 22 motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Claim be GRANTED; that Defendants' motions for summary judgment on Plaintiff's ADA claim (Doc. Nos. 13 , 14 , 22 , 32 ) be GRANTED; that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Giles and Jenkins be DISMISSED with prejudice; that Defendants Ferrell and James' motions for summary judgment on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim (Doc. Nos. 13 , 14 , 32 ) be GRANTED to the extent these Defendants seek dismissal of this claim due to Plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrativeremedy previously available to him at the Ventress Correctional Facility; that Plaintiff 9;s Eighth Amendment claim against Defendants Ferrell and James be DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy available to him during his confinement at the Ventress Correctional Facility; that costs of this action be taxed against Plaintiff for which execution may issue; Objections to R&R due by 11/11/2010. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 10/28/2010. (cc, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
