Cremeens v. The City of Montgomery
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 15, 2010
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 64 Motion to Set Trial; that to the extent that said motion seeks a trial setting in September of 2010, the Court DENIES the motion as that term of court no longer exists; that to the extent that Plaintiff asks that the case be set in the next available term of court, it is GRANTED over Defendant's objection; that the Court will enter a separate amended scheduling order in this matter, but the parties can expect that the trial of this cause will be set in the October 25, 2010 term of court. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/15/2010. (cc, )
|March 11, 2009
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as follows: (1) The 14 Motion to Facilitate class Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) is GRANTED and this case is CONDITIONALLY CERTIFIED as a collective action; (2) The City is DIRECTED to furnish to Cremeens th e names and addresses of all members of the conditionally certified collective action as further set out; (3) It is hereby ORDERED that the proposed notice is APPROVED; (4) Plaintiff is hereby required to file all Consents to Become Party Plaintiffs in this lawsuit by no later than May 15, 2009; and (5) The parties are advised that any motions relating to requests that the collective action be decertified must be filed by the deadline provided in the Uniform Scheduling Order for dispositive motions. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/11/2009. (cb, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?