United States of America v. Stone

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ruth Elizabeth Wise Stone
Case Number: 2:2008cv00646
Filed: August 7, 2008
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Contract: Recovery Student Loan Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Referring Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By: 28:3001 Federal Debt Collection Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 16, 2009 11 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge that the District Judge DENY the plf's 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment; Objections to R&R due by 1/30/2009. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 1/16/09. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Robert Randolph Neeley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruth Elizabeth Wise Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?