Roach v. AKAL Security, Inc.(CONSENT)

Plaintiff: Brett L. Roach
Defendant: AKAL Security, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2008cv00672
Filed: August 19, 2008
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Autauga
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Coody
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 3, 2009 30 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice for the plaintiff's abandonment of his claims, his failure to prosecute this action and failure to comply with the orders of the court. It is further ORDERED that costs be and are hereby TAXED against the plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 6/3/2009. (dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roach v. AKAL Security, Inc.(CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brett L. Roach
Represented By: Keith Anderson Nelms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AKAL Security, Inc.
Represented By: David Turner Wiley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?