Dobbins v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
| William Geoffery Dobbins |
| J. C. Giles, Nettie Burton, John Peasant, Correctional Medical Services, Officer Foaster and Nurse Till |
| 2:2008cv00875 |
| October 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Barbour |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER and OPINION that the 104 recommendation of the Mag Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: (1) the defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED; (2) judgment is entered in favor of defendants; (3) the costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plf; (4) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 6/13/11. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 29 Motion for Extension of time to the extent allowed by this order; It is further Ordered that the plaintiff be granted an extension from 1/27/09 to and including 2/27/09 to file a response to the defendants' special report. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 1/15/09. (vma, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at VCF; furn: cashier. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 11/4/08. (vma, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
