Fegan v. Rodrigues (INMATE1)
Plaintiff: Keith Fegan
Defendant: Dr. Rodrigues
Case Number: 2:2008cv00935
Filed: November 26, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office
County: Bullock
Presiding Judge: Truman M. Hobbs
Presiding Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Keith Fegan; it is the Recommendation of the Mag Judge that this case be transferred to the USDC for the Southern District of Alabama pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1404; Objections to R&R due by 12/15/2008. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 12/3/08. (vma, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fegan v. Rodrigues (INMATE1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Fegan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Rodrigues
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?