Henley et al v. McGriff et al (INMATE 2)
| Richard Henley |
| Seven McGriff, William Wynn, Velinda Weatherly and Steve McGill |
| 2:2008cv01004 |
| December 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Wallace Capel |
| William Keith Watkins |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Report and Recommendations, and that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 6/30/2009. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Mag Judge that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice; Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 6/9/09. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: 1) Plf's claims against the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and the State of Alabama be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and/or (iii); 2) The Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and the State of Alabama be DISMISSED as parties to this cause of action; 3) This case be referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 1/22/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 1/9/2009. (wcl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
