Pope v. The Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE2)
Willie Pope |
The Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and The State of Alabama |
2:2009cv00012 |
January 5, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Barbour |
Wallace Capel |
William Keith Watkins |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 is DISMISSED without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failures to prosecute this action and comply with the orders of the Court. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 4/8/2009. (dmn) |
Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 2 Inmate 1983 Complaint and 10 Amended Complaint, that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failures to prosecute this action and comply with the orders of this court. Objections to R&R due by 3/23/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr. on 3/9/2009. (dmn) |
Filing 7 ORDER directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 6 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Easterling Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr. on 1/26/2009. (dmn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.