Gadsden v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Department et al (INMATE1)
Derrick Gadsden |
Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, Wendy Briggs and Lee Esco |
2:2009cv00018 |
January 7, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Montgomery |
Myron H. Thompson |
Terry F. Moorer |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER adopting the 27 Recommendation; dismissing the case without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 10/14/2011. (br, ) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Mag Judge that: (1) plf's claims against the Montgomery County Sheriff's Department be dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 USC 1915(3)(2)(B)(i); (2) the Montgomery County Sheriff's Department be dismissed as a defendant in this cause of action; (3) this case, with respect to the plf's claims against defs Briggs and Esco, be referred back to the undersigned for appropriate proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 1/22/2009. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 1/9/09. (djy, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order as further set out in order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at MCDF; furn: cashier. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 1/7/09. (vma, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.