Tate v. Price et al (INMATE 1)
Plaintiff: Marcus Orlando Tate
Defendant: Charles Price, Sharon Yates, E. Brooks, D. T. Marshall, Melissa Rittenour and L. T. Rodgers
Case Number: 2:2009cv00221
Filed: March 18, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Mandamus & Other Office
County: Escambia
Presiding Judge: Charles S. Coody
Presiding Judge: Truman M. Hobbs
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying petitioner's 6 Motion for Reconsideration of Judgment, and Opinion and Order. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 5/20/2009. (dmn)
March 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: 1) To the extent Tate seeks mandamus relief, the petition for writ of mandamus be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdi ction; 2) This case, with respect to the claims challenging the constitutionality of Tate's arrest, be dismissed without prejudice for his failure to pay the requisite filing fee upon the initiation of this case as required by the directives of 28 USC 1915(g); Objections to R&R due by 4/7/2009. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 3/25/2009. (wcl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tate v. Price et al (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus Orlando Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharon Yates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. T. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Melissa Rittenour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. T. Rodgers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?