Freeman v. Koch Foods of Alabama

Freeman v. Koch Foods of Alabama

Plaintiff:	Evette S. Freeman
Defendant:	Koch Foods of Alabama
Case Number:	2:2009cv00270
Filed:	March 30, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge:	Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	29:2601 Family and Medical Leave Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2011	Filing 69 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that: 1. The 64 Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend [the] Complaint is DENIED as MOOT. 2. Koch Foods' 40 Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED with respect to the ADA harassment claims and DEN IED as MOOT with respect to the constructive discharge claims; and 3. Koch Foods' 41 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and 4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to remove the above-styled case from the trial docket. The Court will enter a separate final judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/31/2011. (dmn)
December 21, 2010	Filing 56 ORDER: This cause is before the Court on Koch Foods of Alabama's ("Koch Foods") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 41 ), filed on 5/3/2010. Any party wishing to oppose the Court's proposed action shall SHOW CAUSE on or before 12/30/2010, with specific legal authority for their arguments, as to why summary judgment should not be granted on Freeman's reinstatement claim. Show Cause Response due by 12/30/2010. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 12/21/2010. (dmn)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2011

Filing 69 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that: 1. The 64 Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend [the] Complaint is DENIED as MOOT. 2. Koch Foods' 40 Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED with respect to the ADA harassment claims and DEN IED as MOOT with respect to the constructive discharge claims; and 3. Koch Foods' 41 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and 4. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to remove the above-styled case from the trial docket. The Court will enter a separate final judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/31/2011. (dmn)

December 21, 2010

Filing 56 ORDER: This cause is before the Court on Koch Foods of Alabama's ("Koch Foods") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 41 ), filed on 5/3/2010. Any party wishing to oppose the Court's proposed action shall SHOW CAUSE on or before 12/30/2010, with specific legal authority for their arguments, as to why summary judgment should not be granted on Freeman's reinstatement claim. Show Cause Response due by 12/30/2010. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 12/21/2010. (dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Freeman v. Koch Foods of Alabama
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evette S. Freeman
Represented By:	John David Saxon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Koch Foods of Alabama
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?