Partin v. McClendon et al (INMATE1)
Jason Partin |
Officer McClendon, Jason Thomas, Kerry Williams, Curtis James, Carter Davenport and Louis Boyd |
2:2009cv00328 |
April 13, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
Barbour |
Charles S. Coody |
Truman M. Hobbs |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendations; granting plaintiff's 5 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 6/17/2009. (cc, ) |
Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Mag Judge that: (1) the plf's 5 MOTION to Dismiss be granted; (2) This case be DISMISSED without prejudice; Objections to R&R due by 6/4/2009. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 5/22/09. (djy, ) |
Filing 3 VACATED PER ORDER OF 4/21/09 - doc. 6 ***ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $50.18 be paid on or before May 4, 2009; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Ventress CF. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 4/14/2009. (cc, ) Modified on 4/21/2009 (vma, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.