Johnson v. Brooks et al (INMATE1)
| Alvin James Johnson |
| Ellen Brooks and Mike Myrick |
| 2:2009cv00385 |
| April 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER denying as moot 17 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 6/9/09. (vma, )
|
|
Filing
9
VACATED PER ORDER OF 5/12/09 - doc. 13 **ORDER that the plaintiff seeks six copies of forms and may therefore receive such copies from the Clerk of this court by submitting prepayment of $3.00. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 5/12/09. (vma, ) Modified on 5/12/2009 (vma, ).
|
|
Filing
4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Inmate 1983 Complaint filed by Alvin James Johnson; it is the Recommendation of the Mag Judge that: 1) The plaintiff's claims against defendants Brooks and Myrick be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with t he provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); 2) To the extent Johnson presents a claim challenging the constitutionality of actions occurring in a pending state criminal case, this case be dismissed without prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); Objections to R&R due by 5/18/2009. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 5/5/09. (vma, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
