Clark v. Smith et al (INMATE1)
Jermaine Cordell Clark |
Lt. Smith, S. Hill, CO 1 Thomas and Ms. Belcher |
2:2009cv00473 |
May 21, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Barbour |
Wallace Capel |
Ira De Ment |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER that on or before October 2, 2009 the plaintiff shall file a response to 6 and 19 Special Reports. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 8/27/09. (br, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER that on or before September 25, 2009 the defendants shall object or otherwise respond to 16 the interrogatories, request for admissions and request for production of documents submitted by the plaintiff Jermaine Cordell Clark; that the plaint iff shall file no further document related to discovery without permission of the court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to not accept for filing any pleadings, motions or other applications submitted by the plaintiff which are not in compliance with the directives of this order. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 8/26/09. (br, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Ventress CF. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 5/26/2009. (cc, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.