Pennington v. Giles et al (INMATE2)
| Keko Pennington |
| J. C. Giles and Troy King |
| 2:2009cv00576 |
| June 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Barbour |
| Ira De Ment |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER AND OPINION that 17 Report and Recommendations is ADOPTED and that the petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Keko Pennington is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice as time-barred. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 5/24/2011. (cc, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by petitioner why his 1 federal Habeas petition should not be denied as it was not filed within the one-year limitation period established by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1); Show Cause Response due by 9/18/2009. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 8/28/09. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDERED that 8 Motion to Amend is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order and the amended petition to the Attorney General for the State of Alabama and to Warden J.C. Giles. Respondents shall file an answer to the petition, as amended, on or before 8/10/09. ORDERED that Respondents are GRANTED an extension from July 24, 2009 to and including August 10, 2009 to file their answer to the petition, as amended. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 7/16/2009. (cb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
