King v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1)
| Tyrone King |
| Louis Boyd and Ms. Inabinett |
| 2:2009cv00717 |
| July 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| O Office |
| Barbour |
| Ira De Ment |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| None |
| O |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDERED that 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and that plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 3/11/2010. (cb, )
|
|
Filing
6
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff's 4 Motion to Dismiss be granted and that this case be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 3/3/2010. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 2/18/2010. (cb, )
|
|
Filing
3
(VACATED per 5 )ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $14.67 be paid on or before 2/1/2010 ; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk Easterling Correctional Facility. **Copy provided to account clerk as directed**. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 1/12/2009. (cb, ) Modified on 2/4/2010 to vacate order.(cb, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
