Chantilly Store ALL LLC v. Spear et al
Chantilly Store ALL LLC |
Sarah G Spear, John Ashmore and Debbie Richardson |
2:2009cv00921 |
September 29, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Montgomery |
Mark E. Fuller |
Charles S. Coody |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER directing Defendants TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the 16 Motion to Strike or in the Alternative Motion for 56(f) Extension should not be granted by no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, November 23. Show Cause Response due by 11/23/2009. Plaintiff ma y file a reply by no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, November 30; and the deadline for Defendants to file a reply brief (Doc. 12 ) to Plaintiff's response to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint is CONTINUED generally. Accordingly, Defendants' 17 MOTION for Extension of Time is DENIED as moot. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 11/12/2009. (dmn) |
Filing 14 ORDER re Plaintiff's 13 MOTION for Clarification. ORDERED that (1) Defendants' 5 -5 is DENIED as moot; and (2) This Court's 9 Order scheduling briefing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is VACATED. (3) The parties are advised that the deadlines in this Court's 12 Order scheduling briefing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint remain in effect. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/21/2009. (dmn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.