Granger v. Meredith (INMATE 1)

Granger v. Meredith (INMATE 1)

Plaintiff:	Bobby Ray Granger
Defendant:	John Meredith
Case Number:	2:2009cv00931
Filed:	October 5, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Montgomery Office
County:	Montgomery
Presiding Judge:	Wallace Capel
Presiding Judge:	Truman M. Hobbs
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 14, 2010	Filing 7 ORDER directing that the 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; further ORDERED as follows: (1) To the extent Plaintiff asserts claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, his complaint is DISMISSED, as this Court lacks subject matter j urisdiction over such claims because of Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (2) To the extent the complaint asserts any related state law claims, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over such state law claims and, accordingly, such claims are DISMISSED; a separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/14/10. (scn, )
October 7, 2009	Filing 5 ORDER directing Plaintiff TO SHOW CAUSE why his complaint, to the extent it raises claims under the FTCA, should not be dismissed for his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by 28 U.S.C. 2675(a). Show Cause Response due by 10/28/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr. on 10/7/2009. (dmn)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 14, 2010

Filing 7 ORDER directing that the 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; further ORDERED as follows: (1) To the extent Plaintiff asserts claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, his complaint is DISMISSED, as this Court lacks subject matter j urisdiction over such claims because of Plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (2) To the extent the complaint asserts any related state law claims, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over such state law claims and, accordingly, such claims are DISMISSED; a separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 9/14/10. (scn, )

October 7, 2009

Filing 5 ORDER directing Plaintiff TO SHOW CAUSE why his complaint, to the extent it raises claims under the FTCA, should not be dismissed for his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by 28 U.S.C. 2675(a). Show Cause Response due by 10/28/2009. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr. on 10/7/2009. (dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Granger v. Meredith (INMATE 1)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bobby Ray Granger
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: John Meredith
Represented By:	Robert Randolph Neeley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?