Barnett v. United States Tennis Association

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Middle District Barnett v. United States Tennis Association

Barnett v. United States Tennis Association

Plaintiff:	Kenneth W. Barnett
Defendant:	United States Tennis Association
Case Number:	2:2009cv01060
Filed:	November 17, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Montgomery Office
County:	Autauga
Presiding Judge:	Wallace Capel
Presiding Judge:	Mark E. Fuller
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 19, 2009	Filing 6 ORDERED that (1) plaintiff's 5 Motion to Reconsider this Court's denial of plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is denied; (2) plaintiff's 5 Motion to Reconsider this Court's denial of plaintiff's Motio n for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is denied; (3) plaintiff's 5 Motion to Continue is granted. The telephone status conference set in this case for 11/20/09 at 10:00 a.m. is CONTINUED to 11/20/09 at 11:00 a.m. The court will initiate the telephone conference call to the number provided by plaintiff. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 11/19/09. (sl, )
November 17, 2009	Filing 4 ORDERED that: (1) PLAINTIFF'S 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied; (2) plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee by no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, November 30, 2009. The court reminds plaintiff that his lawsuit may be dismissed for want of prosecution if he fails to pay the filing fee. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 11/17/09. (sl, )

Date Filed

Document Text

November 19, 2009

Filing 6 ORDERED that (1) plaintiff's 5 Motion to Reconsider this Court's denial of plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is denied; (2) plaintiff's 5 Motion to Reconsider this Court's denial of plaintiff's Motio n for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is denied; (3) plaintiff's 5 Motion to Continue is granted. The telephone status conference set in this case for 11/20/09 at 10:00 a.m. is CONTINUED to 11/20/09 at 11:00 a.m. The court will initiate the telephone conference call to the number provided by plaintiff. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 11/19/09. (sl, )

November 17, 2009

Filing 4 ORDERED that: (1) PLAINTIFF'S 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied; (2) plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee by no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, November 30, 2009. The court reminds plaintiff that his lawsuit may be dismissed for want of prosecution if he fails to pay the filing fee. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 11/17/09. (sl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnett v. United States Tennis Association
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth W. Barnett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States Tennis Association
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?