Owuor v. Montgomery Municipal Jail et al (INMATE1)
| Peter Makusi Otemba Owuor |
| Montgomery Municipal Jail, J. C. Welch, Ms. Bibb and Ms. Abner |
| 2:2009cv01098 |
| December 3, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Ira De Ment |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that the plaintiff's claims against the Montgomery Municipal Jail be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); that this case, with respect to the plai ntiff's claims against the remaining defendants regarding the conditions of confinement and actions taken against him during his confinement in the Montgomery Municipal Jail, be referred back to the undersigned for appropriate proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 12/23/2009. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 12/9/2009. (br, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Elmore County Jail. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 12/8/2009. (br, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
