Pegues v. Warden et al (INMATE 3)
| Demetrious Terrell Pegues |
| Warden, Federal Prison, Attorney General of the United States and United States of America |
| 2:2010cv00212 |
| March 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| W. Harold Albritton |
| Wallace Capel |
| Wallace Capel |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER that the 11 Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Pegue's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED because the claims therein entitle him to no relief, and the case is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/24/2011. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. This court concludes that Pegues's instant pleading should be construed as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ORDERED that on or before 4/14/2010 , Pegues shall advise this court whether he seeks to do one of the following: 1. Proceed before this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on those claims presented in his motion (Doc. No. 1 ); 2. Amend his motion to assert any additional claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on which he wishes to challenge the conviction and sentence imposed upon him by this court; or 3. Withdraw his motion. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr. on 3/24/2010. (dmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
