Scharff v. Wyeth et al
| Kathleen Scharff |
| Wyeth and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv00220 |
| March 11, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Wallace Capel |
| Wallace Capel |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
258
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 240 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/1/12. (scn, )
|
|
Filing
238
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/19/11. (scn, )
|
|
Filing
223
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that Defendants' 76 motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's negligence claim in Count I, and Counts II-VII in their entirety, and ruling is RESERVED on Defendants' causa tion argument, as further set out; further, pursuant to Rule 56(f) of the FRCP, and in the interests of judicial economy and the parties' resources, it is ORDERED that Mrs. Scharff SHOW CAUSE, on or before August 12, 2011, why summary judgment should not be granted on her remaining wanton failure to warn and wanton design claims; Wyeth shall respond on or before August 19, 2011. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/2/11. (scn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
