Feagin v. Southern Health Partners et al (INMATE 1)
| Michael E. Feagin |
| Diane W., Willard McWhorter, Annette Cain and Southern Health Partners |
| 2:2010cv00252 |
| March 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Charles S. Coody |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING 18 Report and Recommendation and plaintiff's 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 5/11/2010. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER: (1) The 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order is treated as both a motion for a temporary restraining order and a motion for preliminary injunction. (2) The 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is denied. (3) The MOTION for Preliminary Injunction is referred to the magistrate judge for consideration. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/25/2010. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Covington County Jail. Signed by Honorable Charles S. Coody on 3/24/2010. (dmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
