Hodge v. Keller (INMATE 3)

Plaintiff: Roger Hodge
Defendant: J. A. Keller
Case Number: 2:2010cv00284
Filed: March 30, 2010
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
Presiding Judge: Ira De Ment
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 3, 2011 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 13 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 USC § 2241 petition for habeas corpus relief is DISMISSED without prejudice because this case is not ripe for review and because of Hodge's failure to exhaust administrative remedies in accordance with the procedures established by the BOP. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 10/3/2011. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hodge v. Keller (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Hodge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. A. Keller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?