Jerido v. Harmon et al (INMATE 1)
||Antonio Orlander Jerido
||Ken Harmon, Ann Davis, Captain White, Lt. Bland and Officer Green
||April 9, 2010
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Truman M. Hobbs
||Susan Russ Walker
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 3, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION directing that (1) The defendants motion for summary judgment be GRANTED to the extent the defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaintiffs failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to hi m at the Chilton County Jail; (2) This case be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy provided to him during his confinement in the Chilton County Jail as this remedy is no longer available to him with respect to the claims presented in the this cause of action; (3) No costs are taxed herein. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 7/3/13. (scn, )
|April 13, 2010
ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $2.48 be paid on or before April 30, 2010; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Chilton County Jail. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 4/13/2010. (br, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?