McNemere v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
||State of Alabama, Governor of Alabama, Todd Strange, Judge Hendley and Baptist Health Hospital
||April 22, 2010
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||Truman M. Hobbs
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 25, 2010
ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge; further ORDERING as follows: (1) the § 1983 claims presented against Dfts State of Alabama and Judge Hendley are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S. C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); (2) Plfs § 1983 claims against Defs Baptist Health Hospital, the Governor of Alabama, and Mayor Todd Strange are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); (3) Plfs challenge to the constitutionality of his current detention is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claim is not properly before the court at this time; and (4) This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). Signed by Honorable Truman M. Hobbs on 5/25/10. (djy, )
|April 26, 2010
ORDER granting 2 motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Montgomery City Jail. Signed by Honorable Wallace Capel, Jr on 4/26/10. Furnished to cashier.(djy, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?