City Skies, Inc. et al v. BCI Aircraft Leasing, Inc. et al
||City Skies, Inc. and Ronald Mays
||BCI Aircraft Leasing, Inc., Brian Hollnagel and Joe Cirillo
||May 12, 2010
||US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
||W. Harold Albritton
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 4, 2011
ORDER adopting 22 Report and Recommendations; granting defendants' 17 Motion to Dismiss; that City Skies, Inc. is DISMISSED as a Plaintiff in this case; that the claims alleged by City Skies, Inc. against Defendants BCI Aircraft Leasing, Inc ., Brian Hollnagel, and Joe Cirillo are DISMISSED without prejudice; that this case will proceed on the claims of Plaintiff Ronald Mays; that this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/4/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )
|December 10, 2010
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that defendants' 17 MOTION to Dismiss be GRANTED as to Plaintiff City Skies, Inc.; that City Skies, Inc. be DISMISSED as a plaintiff in this case; that the claims alleged by City Skies, Inc. against Defendants BCI Ai rcraft Leasing, Inc., Brian Hollnagel, and Joe Cirillo by City Skies, Inc., be DISMISSED without prejudice; that claims made by Plaintiff Mays be permitted to proceed; that this case be referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 12/27/2010. Signed by Honorable Terry F. Moorer on 12/10/2010. (cc, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?