Sanderson v. Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Commission et al (INMATE1)
| Donald Ray Sanderson |
| Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Commission, Montgomery County Jail and Robert E. Luske, Jr. |
| 2:2010cv00430 |
| May 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Madison |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER directing the Clerk to provide the plaintiff with a copy of the 8 order entered on June 2, 2010; advising plaintiff that if he seeks to proceed on claims regarding the conditions of confinement to which he was subjected during his prior incar ceration in the Montgomery County Detention Facility he may now do so by filing a separate 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action raising such claims and naming those persons actually personally responsible for these conditions; directing the Clerk to supply plaintiff with a 1983 complaint form and IFP application. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 10/5/2010. Copies of order and blank forms mailed as directed.(br, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Limestone Correctional. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 5/19/2010. (wcl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
