Stallworth v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al (INMATE2)
Kinwen LaMarrow Stallworth |
Kilby Correctional Facility, John Cummins and Shirley Rogers |
2:2010cv00469 |
May 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Montgomery Office |
Montgomery |
Ira De Ment |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER adopting 25 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; dismissing the complaint without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 2/17/2011. (br, ) |
Filing 20 ORDER AND OPINION adopting the 15 Recommendation; dismissing the claims against the Kilby Correctional Facility with prejudice prior to service; dismissing Kilby Correctional Facility as a party; referring the case back to the Magistrate for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 9/29/2010. (br, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER ON MOTION denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel for reasons set out in the order. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 7/1/2010. (br, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $14.23 be paid on or before June 24, 2010; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Kilby Correctional. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 6/3/2010. (br, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.