Johnson v. Progress Rail Services Corporation

Plaintiff: Chadwick Johnson
Defendant: Progress Rail Services Corporation
Case Number: 2:2010cv00561
Filed: June 30, 2010
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Dallas
Presiding Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 10, 2011 32 Opinion or Order of the Court FINAL JUDGMENT directing that summary judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against the plaintiff on all of plaintiff's claims. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 11/10/11. (Furnished to Calendar and JT.)(Term'd: Final PTC: 03/15/2012 and Jury Trial 04/16/2012)(scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Progress Rail Services Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chadwick Johnson
Represented By: Elizabeth Peyton Faulk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progress Rail Services Corporation
Represented By: Gordon Liddell Blair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?