Owens v. Correctional Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)
| Raymond P. Owens |
| Correctional Medical Services, MHM Correctional Services, Inc., Alabama Department of Corrections and Tai Q. Chung |
| 2:2010cv00652 |
| July 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Madison |
| Truman M. Hobbs |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER AND OPINION: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 68 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 3. This case is dismissed with prejudice. 4. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 3/22/2013. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $28.47 be paid on or before 8/23/2010; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Limestone Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 8/2/2010. (dmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
