Fortner v. Canty et al (INMATE2)
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 16, 2011
ORDER adopting the 23 Recommendation; dismissing the case with prejudice. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 3/16/2011. (br, )
|January 4, 2011
ORDER adopting the 14 Report and Recommendations; granting the 8 Motion to Dismiss Defendants Woods, Barbers, Sconyers, and Boyd; dismissing the same defendants with prejudice; referring the case back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 1/4/2011. (br, )
|December 15, 2010
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that the 8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants Woods, Barbers, Sconyers, and Boyd be GRANTED; that Defendants Woods, Barbers, Sconyers, and Boyd be DISMISSED with prejudice as parties to this complaint; and that this case with respect to the remaining defendants be referred back to the undersigned for additional proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 12/29/2010. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 12/15/2010. (br, )
|September 27, 2010
ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $7.56 be paid on or before October 18, 2010; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at Easterling Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 9/27/2010. (br, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?