Rush v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2)
| J. D. Rush |
| Louis Boyd, Sandra Hayes and Sherry Seals |
| 2:2010cv00850 |
| October 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Barbour |
| Ira De Ment |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
FINAL JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that judgment be and the same is entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff and that this cause be and the same is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket asa final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 2/8/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (dmn)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER ON MOTION directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $3.82 be paid on or before November 3, 2010; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting 2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at the Easterling Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Susan Russ Walker on 10/13/2010. (br, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
