Hall v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Plaintiff: Derrick Lashaun Hall
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2010cv01040
Filed: December 7, 2010
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Barbour
Referring Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 7, 2013 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER directing that, after an independent and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that (1) The 10 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/7/13. (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derrick Lashaun Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Monica Anne Stump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?