Deloach v. Cooper Lighting(MAG+)

Plaintiff: Terenzo M. Deloach
Defendant: Cooper Lighting
Case Number: 2:2010cv01082
Filed: December 21, 2010
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Barbour
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42:12102
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 24, 2011 41 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: 1. The 37 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. Defendant's 10 Motion to Dismiss and 28 Motion to Dismiss are DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 8/24/2011. (dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deloach v. Cooper Lighting(MAG+)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terenzo M. Deloach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cooper Lighting
Represented By: Emily S. Borna
Represented By: Brandon M. Cordell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?